Fight the Heist

What’s the Story?

Last month, the International Labour Rights Forum (ILRF) issued a report jointly with the Asia Floor Wages Alliance (AFWA) setting out claims for unpaid wages of $71 million owed to hundreds of thousands of low-paid workers in Asia, 70% of them women.

The missing wages comprise COVID wage amounts, unpaid overtime and unpaid layoff wages for factory closures. Even more is owed for illegal minimum wage and sex discrimination violations.

A complaint has now been lodged in the USA by some 20 Asian unions for breach of the OECD guidelines for responsible business conduct.

The OECD guidelines define how companies in developed economies should monitor for adverse impacts of their operations, and take action where these arise.

Several fashion giants are mentioned, but Nike attracts particular attention. The unions are said to be shocked at Nike’s $18 billion share buyback program but also by the 2020 dividend pay-out, which paid $74 million to the founder Knight family, a sum exceeding the supply chain missing wages.

Why Does it Matter?

Nike is an outstanding company. The 2021 Impact Report sets out extensive detail on its ESG profile and purpose. In August 2020 it gave staff a week of paid leave to help ease COVID related work pressures.

The Nike wage analysis for employees shows impressively that there is zero evidence of either gender pay gap or ethnicity pay gap. There is a strong array of employee benefits including multiple aspects of wellbeing including mental wellbeing.

The health and safety section of the Impact Report also references targets within the Nike global supply chain.

And yet the AFWA international coordinator is reported as saying Nike is targeted not just for its $185 billion size, but also because the company has been “unresponsive” to complaints from workers’ representatives.

This is surprising as Nike’s reputation is of importance as a consumer facing brand with thousands of direct employees. Three months ago, for example, a Nike spokesperson said “Kylie Irving is no longer a Nike athlete” when the basketball star was dropped over an anti-semitism row.

Nike is not under any contractual obligation for these missing wages, nor has its practices breached any law. But the union appeal to the OECD guidance is novel and may prompt many global companies to take a fresh look at the supply chain profile and responsibilities.

Newspoint view

The missing wages for these Asian employees is due from their employers. The Asian trade unions are rightly holding these companies to account and are using a novel tactic to increase pressure to deliver a just result.

Huge global companies with large buying power are in a position to require their supply chain to comply with the buyer’s required standards. As companies report their carbon footprint under Scope 3 this will be seen increasingly.

Nike already has a strong commitment to improving supply chain health and safety. Plainly, a safe, working environment is a minimum starting point, but well-being at work extends to other factors, such as fair pay and non-discrimination.

Much of this issue relates to global inequality. The UN sustainable development goals are also a guide to good business practice. SDG 10 is “reduce inequalities”, but SDG 1 “no poverty” and SDG 3 “good health and well-being” are also important.

Not everything can be fixed at once. The first job is to commit to making a difference then the second job is to act, and monitor the improving results.

Nike gets this, the impact report says:

“ We know that progress will not be linear, but accountability… means sharing our successes and learning from our setbacks.”

CORPGRO Helps Companies With:

Please feel free to email or call:

Damian Carnell - [email protected] +44 (0) 7989 337118

VA Bec Bostock - [email protected]

Please share this CORPGRO information with your board or your colleagues.